Myths of wrong doings at Uphaar Cinema Blown to Smithereens! (continues…)
As Mr. R.K. Naseem , Advocate for the defence continues his arguments on the Uphaar Cinema case, it is becoming evidently clear day by day, as the hearing continues, that Mr. Sushil Ansal and Mr. Gopal Ansal are being unduly ‘victimized’.
1. Supreme Court rulings demonstrate absence of criminal negligence
Today Mr. Naseem has concluded the arguments by referring to the various judgements of the Supreme Court of India. In the judgements referred by Mr. Naseem it has been held that the act of a person should be the direct cause of death and it should not be a remote cause. It has also been held by the Supreme Court that even if there is violation of rules and regulations, it does not constitute any offence much less a culpable or criminal negligence
